As a visual processor, I created this info graphic during the PBL World conference to remember the inspiration each day brought throughout the week. From growing, building, flipping, and evolving, the message was that we shape students for their best possible future. How we do that is through being real, providing real, and letting them explore all while creating beautiful work. Each speaker was providing a different take on the same challenge and meeting that challenge in a way that I admire and hope to emulate.
Monday, June 30, 2014
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
OneDrive - My new friend

Sharing information has been easy and simple with Google Drive and Dropbox, however, my organization has adopted Microsoft Office 365 and OneDrive for Business to protect data and provide consistency for district, school, faculty, and student communication and collaboration. While I work on the district level to design and develop online learning, I also teach for our virtual high school - to improve my practice and because working with a class of my own keeps me grounded to the essence of education - students. This time of year our entire district is focused on End of Course Exams (EOCs), Advanced Placement Exams, and the state achievement tests for elementary and middle schools.
My AP Art History class is entirely online, no textbook for students to review during this crucial crunch time. While they can review content from the course and their notes at any time, several students were asking for a timeline to support their study efforts. I spent two weeks walking back through the course from ancient Mesopotamia through the Renaissance, and into contemporary modern art. The trick was how to best share the document with students while it was being created, and how to allow for some crowd sourcing of content from the class. A final consideration was the file size, as we continued to add images of master works the document grew beyond the ability to email through our system.
Microsoft OneDrive provided the best asynchronous means to upload and share the spreadsheet timeline with my class. At first I shared the link with them through email, but last night after our most recent synchronous study session using Blackboard Collaborate, I discovered an instant QR code creator right inside the system. By clicking on the three little dots after a document, and then choosing "Share", one is able to "Get a Link" that can be emailed or embedded in our course. However, there is a little phone icon after the link and clicking on that icon provides an immediate QR code for either viewing or editing the document. I can't wait to share this with teachers in our district!
Friday, April 25, 2014
The most exciting thing to happen to blended learning since the invention of the blender!
As a long-time blended learning teacher, advocate, and consultant my greatest struggle has always been how best to communicate and support the blended shift in a school or classroom. Many teachers view blended learning as flipping instruction, or as student use of online resources or purchased instructional programs. However, true blended learning goes beyond surface level technology integration, it creates a fundamental instructional shift in the classroom. Even with teachers that "get it" there continues to be the challenge of administrator buy-in and technology support. The Clayton Christensen Institute's site has been my go-to spot for explaining and introducing those in my organization to the various models and practices current in blended learning environments. An exciting new resource created in partnership with the Clayton Christensen Institute and Silicon Schools Fund provides a free and open course that anyone can access and complete on Khan Academy. This Massively Open Online Course (MOOC) provides structured and specific information guiding participants through definitions, models, case studies, practical applications, and in-depth uses of the various models to support stunt growth and achievement. Click on the image above to see the elegantly designed course and learn more about blended learning. Happy blending!
Thursday, April 17, 2014
The power of infographics
For those of us who are visual, creative, thinkers... data can be overwhelming. Just picking up a budget spreadsheet causes my eyes to glaze over. However, great sites now offer professionally created inforgraphics covering a wide range of interesting concepts, topics, data, and ideas. My favorite of these sites is http://visual.ly
![]() |
| Each week Visual.ly sends out an email with new and interesting info graphics. Taking a break from current tasks and browsing through the imagery rejuvenates and inspires. |
Recently I felt bold enough to try out some info graphic creation of my own. I've seen some useful tools and templates online, but I wanted something a little more organic and a little less helpful. HubSpot has a free PowerPoint template with 5 preset graphic styles. Everything a creative needs to get started and test the waters. I signed up on their site for the free templates, here is the link: Free Infographic Template on HubSpot. Then I make a copy of the original, delete all but one of the slides, delete most of the template content, and design away. I've also found it useful to build in stages, using a separate PPT file to create a section of content and the copy and paste all onto the info graphic template. Once my design is complete, I save it as a PDF, the open the PDF and export as an image. To me this is a natural way to tell a visual story using familiar tools and processes.
Here's an example of my first attempt. This info graphic was used in a district-wide online professional developent training on Common Core, PARCC assessments, and the connection of those to our district strategic plan - MNPS 2018. You can see how each of the three sections is divided, those were each built separately in their own PPT file and then copied and added to the info graphic file. Once the major content and imagery was in place, I shared the raw file with my team and had them make changes to text and font, shadows, and reflections to produce a jazzier feel. The final product was then uploaded in the course and printed off using a poster maker.
We were all rather pleased with the results but were unprepared for the popularity of the graphic. Several schools have made their own posters of the info graphic, and recently one school even tweeted out an image of the poster.
So, why not give it a shot? Download the templates for yourself and see what you can do. Just be sure to post in the comments so others can see your amazing info art!
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Discovering Discussion Posts
Discussion posts provide students with the opportunity to test out learning and gain feedback from peers. Throughout our learning journey we have posted initial thoughts concerning prompts proposed in our course utilizing resources shared from primary resources.
As one considers the opportunities such constructive and collaborative activities provide, where would you find resources to engage your students on the topic of online assessment? How would you share these resources with your audience?
The following rubric will be used to score your response:
As one considers the opportunities such constructive and collaborative activities provide, where would you find resources to engage your students on the topic of online assessment? How would you share these resources with your audience?
The following rubric will be used to score your response:
Score 4 worth 25 points—student correctly identifies the artwork and connects the image to the prompt (20 pts). Student includes the cultural context of the artwork, directly connecting the culture with the artwork’s physical attributes in at least three areas (30 pts). There are not any significant errors.
Score 3 worth 24–20 points—student correctly identifies the artwork and connects the image to the prompt (20 pts). Student includes the cultural context of the artwork directly connecting the culture with the artwork’s physical attributes in two areas (25–20 pts). There may be a few minor errors.
Score 2 worth 19–15 points—student correctly identifies the artwork but does not connect the image to the prompt (10 pts) or student does not correctly identify the artwork but identifies the style, culture or time period (10 pts) with correct reasons to support their statements (15 pts). Student includes some cultural context of the artwork and only attempts to describe the artwork’s physical attributes (20–15 pts). The essay is generally not well developed. There may be significant errors.
Score 1 worth 14–10 points—student does not identify the artwork or connect the image to the prompt. Student includes only vague cultural context for the artwork and only attempts to describe the artwork’s physical attributes (25–20 pts). The essay is generally not well developed. There may be significant errors.
Score 0 worth 0–9 points—attempt is made but without valid concepts (15 pts) or no attempt is made (0pts).
Friday, June 14, 2013
Detection v. Inspiration
Detection
While some free online tools exist to
support the detection of plagiarism, most institutions purchase programs such
as Turnitin, Grammerly, and SafeAssign, to check not only Internet
resource plagiarism, but to host a database of previously submitted student
work for the institution. This practice
can greatly enhance an institution’s ability to hold students accountable for
academic integrity, even if a student copies his or her own work from a
previous course. Although these programs
promote the ethical use of information, they create a false sense of security
in that the work a student submits is their own. In my district’s virtual school, there were
some cases in which a student account was submitting work of sufficient
academic integrity, however, the student’s parent was doing all the work. This prompted the virtual school to implement a
policy in which content in an online course is split into modules and each
student must schedule a “call-in” with the teacher of record to talk about what
they have learned in the module. This
process has greatly helped in ensuring that the student of record is the one
completing the work. The virtual school final
course exams are proctored and students must come to a testing site and provide
photo identification to be given the online exam. In this manner, the virtual school has been
able to prove that the student of record is the individual completing and
submitting the work.
The punitive nature of copyright infringement,
whether intentional or unintentional can hinder the body of academic work and
creativity (Jocoy, & DiBiase, 2006).
Last year during the training for building blended courses in
Blackboard©, teachers were cautioned and trained on the proper use of citation
and copyrighted materials. The fear of
retribution convinced some teachers to limit their use of the learning
management system and caused a backlash from others concerned about their own
intellectual property rights.
Inspiration
More important than the detection of
plagiarism is the development of student’s sense of ethics and integrity. Challenging students and building a culture
of respect for individual contributions will have a greater and more positive
impact than whether a program caught a “copy/paste” infraction. The lesson is not, in the not getting caught,
but in the not wanting to steal in the first place.
Just as the Internet has provided
almost unlimited access to information in the virtual classroom, teachers in the
physical classroom have had to deal with these issues as well. In a great post entitled, “Google-Proof
Questioning: A New Use For Bloom’s Taxonomy”, blogger and educator John
Sowash shares how teachers can challenge students in meaningful and creative
ways. Similarly, online courses can be
designed with the intention of getting beyond the copy/paste option and into
the creation of more personalized content that cannot be stolen but must be
created to meet a specific goal.
References:
Jocoy,
C., & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study
in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open &
Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-15. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the
Education Research Complete database.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Lions, Technology, and Multimedia ..."Oh My!"
Lions
Have you seen the GEICO© commercial with the Antelopes? Poor Carl the king of beasts, reduced to slinking away from a delicious meal because of technology. Have you ever wondered how the story ends? Do the antelopes realize that they will have to take off the night vision goggles in the daytime? What if Carl comes up on their blind side? Reliance on technology alone is a dangerous thing.
Technology and Multimedia
Technology
provides a vehicle for delivery of communication in the online environment (Simonson,
Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2008).
Multimedia designed well and with a focusing purpose can add to the
content delivery and meeting of diverse learner needs (Cooper, Colwel, &
Jelfs, 2007). While all these are useful
aspects of technology, some drawbacks include the diverse systems, software,
platforms, and Internet speeds of the student.
As
an instructional designer in the learning technology department of my
organization, there is a constant battle between the use of technology for the
sake of technology and the careful design and implementation of technology to
enhance learning. Two years ago, our
state received a large grant called “Race to the Top” from the federal
government to increase instructional use of technology, STEM, and the technology
infrastructure of the district. One
million dollars of the grant was set up as a competitive grant, which all
schools were able to submit a proposal.
Guidelines and stipulations were given, but the end goal was to
encourage school leaders to break out into innovative ideas and strategies for
the use of technology to engage students and teachers. The surprising and sad fact was that many of
the grants were more about the “stuff” than the learner outcomes and program
goals. The schools that were chosen came
up with some terrific ideas, and all those who submitted put a lot of work into their proposals,
but technology alone is not the answer (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, &
Zvacek, 2008). In a similar manner, an
online instructor must carefully plan and design the use of technology as a
tool to meet a desired student outcome (Conrad, & Donaldson, 2011). If transactional distances are vast,
meaningful interactions made possible by the technology will increase the
engagement and construction of collective meaning (Boettcher, & Conrad,
2010).
When
designing instruction in any medium, the designer must first consider and
analyze the target audience. As a clear
picture of the end user is developed, better choices can be made as to appropriate
learning objects and course design (Burgstahler, 2006). Not all students may have access to
high-speed Internet, or unlimited streaming capabilities. Students may have time or geographical
distances that would make synchronous activities difficult. Many online courses include a minimum
requirement list to help students assess their equipment and access to the
content.
Drive by trainings... "Oh My!"
Through
my work in the K-12 realm, I am most excited by the possibility of creating
sustainable professional learning communities through our district learning
management system. In the past we have
jokingly referred to our efforts for professional development to be “drive by
trainings” in which participants enjoyed the session, but little transference
occurred from theory to practice. With
148 schools, and over 5,000 teachers, our small staff of 7 struggles to make
inroads into the classroom. However, by
offering face-to-face sessions with an online organization and online
professional development, we are beginning to see that the continuous support
and online interaction creates an elearning community focused around a
purpose. In a recent webinar, one of the
speakers shared a profound thought that collaborative learning leads to
collective knowledge (Marini, McGonagle, & Peterson, 2013). The opportunity to facilitate groups, project
based learning, discussions, and shared content with the powerful connection of
the learning management system has me excited about the upcoming year in our
schools. Here is a simple Infographic I created to help explain the concept of online interaction as it relates to face-to-face interaction.
![]() | ||
| Levels of Interaction created by Tischann Nye, March, 2013 for the MNPS Learning Technology Department. |
References:
Boettcher,
J. V., & Conrad, R. (2010). The online teaching survival guide: Simple
and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Burgstahler,
S. (2006).The development of accessibility indicators for distance learning
programs. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 14(1/2), 79-102.
Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete database.
Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete database.
Conrad,
R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities
and resources for creative instruction (Updated ed.). San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cooper,
M., Colwell, C., & Jelfs, A. (2007). Embedding accessibility and usability:
Considerations for e-learning research and development projects. ALT-J:
Research in Learning Technology, 15(3), 231-245.
Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete database.
Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete database.
Marini, P., McGonagle, L., Peterson,
K., (2013, June). Collaboration and Content in Online
Course Design [webinar]. EdTech
Leaders Online (ETLO). Archived at: http://www.edtechleaders.org/webinars
Simonson,
M., Smaldino S., Albright M., & Zvacek S. (2008). Teaching and learning
at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
What you don't know can kill your course.
-->
Learning from Failure
In designing and delivering an
asynchronous online training for teachers in my district, I failed to
understand the importance of several key factors to the successful launch of a
course. The first training launched in
the spring of 2012, and I used my MacBook Pro© and Google Chrome© to build the
course in our district LMS, Blackboard©.
When teachers began taking the course, there were a lot of complaints
that the system was difficult, that videos did not play, or that links
mentioned in the course were not appearing on the screen. As I researched these issues, I discovered the
following:
1. Google Chrome© is not a supported
browser for Blackboard©.
2. Internet Explorer© 7 was an obsolete
browser for Blackboard©, but was the predominant default browser on all teacher
use computers at the time of launch.
3. Participant computers needed updated
Flash© plug-ins to play videos.
Needless to say, these issues greatly
frustrated the participants, many of whom were not confident in their abilities
to use technology and therefore felt defeated by the training.
Fast-forward one year and the latest
roll-out of the training contains some useful introductory information
concerning expectations for the course, navigation directions, and technical
requirements. I have used familiar
symbols to guide my learners through the course since many of them are new to
online learning. Similarly, images of
the log-in page with browser check requirements are posted. Our Blackboard© Administrator actually added
the browser compliance check after feedback from me in the first training roll out.
Content from Blended Learning Training: Roadsigns to Point the Way
Throughout this online course you will see signs and directions similar to the question mark sign to the left. A guide for all the signs in the course is shown below. Note that some signs point out the direction you will need to scroll to see the next piece of the training, some point out informational text, others show where a particular action is needed on your part, and finally there are signs to indicate the end of a portion or the end of the course.
(USDT, 2009)
Read through the information below to note the method for directing you through what you should do each step of the way.
Roadsigns used in this course.
References:
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration, (2009). United States road symbol signs. Manual on Uniform Control Traffic Devices (MUCTD). PDF Retrieved From: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/services/publications/fhwaop02084/index.htm
Make your first impression a good one!
In an online course, there is only one
chance at a first impression. As I
designed this course, careful consideration was taken to address the analyzed
needs of my learners. As an added level
of review, I asked my neighbor who is retired, aged 69, and not a computer user
(except for looking up motorcycles on Craigslist) to navigate the course and
provide constructive criticism. His
honest thoughts as he test-drove the course helped show me areas that were
unclear to an objective participant.
This new and improved version launched in April 2013 and has received
reviews that clearly show that learners are engaging with the content instead
of the helpdesk!
| |||
| Screen shot of the landing page of the orientation, a fun character greets the learner, directions are provided on next steps, and narrative text is available to support universal design for learning. |
|
|
Friday, May 10, 2013
Online Learning Communities
-->
While the traditional classroom remains teacher centered, the online environment fosters more interaction among students and is one of the cited benefits of online learning by both teachers and students (Stacey, & Wiesenberg, 2007). Although considerable time is needed to build the course material prior to launching the course, teachers have seen growth in their craft by the reflective practice of reviewing their content for delivery online and in the rich discussions students create online and which instructors facilitate rather than dictate (So, & Bush, 2008).
While the traditional classroom remains teacher centered, the online environment fosters more interaction among students and is one of the cited benefits of online learning by both teachers and students (Stacey, & Wiesenberg, 2007). Although considerable time is needed to build the course material prior to launching the course, teachers have seen growth in their craft by the reflective practice of reviewing their content for delivery online and in the rich discussions students create online and which instructors facilitate rather than dictate (So, & Bush, 2008).
Students have access
to the material and can participate online in ways that are difficult to manage
in a face-to-face, synchronous manner. Students further develop skills in
time-management and technology proficiency that will serve them well in further
study and the career environment (Allen, Seaman, & Garrett, 2007). The
restriction of location is mitigated as well by the online environment;
students receive the benefit of a greater amount of viewpoints when the student
base is diverse.
While there are
numerous benefits for online learning, several issues remain to threaten the
efficacy of this method of instruction.
Teachers must be clear and structured in their online environment so
that students understand what is to be done online and how to accomplish the
assigned tasks (Stacey, & Weisenberg, 2007). Students also need to see that the online
component is complimenting the traditional instruction without doubling the
workload (So, & Bush, 2008).
Student Engagement
from a frustrated student’s perspective:
Role of teachers in
the digital age:
Conclusion
Online communities offer an opportunity
for students to gain valuable skills that will serve them well in their offline
lives. Well-planned online content that
allows for student interaction, both fosters a collegial mentality while
deepening the knowledge of the student (Stacey, & Weisenberg, 2007). Wise use of the online environment builds
community and strengthens face-to-face interactions (So, & Bush,
2008). For teachers who pay attention to
student workload and facilitate their online environment, the benefits are
greater for blended classroom instruction than either virtual or face-to-face
methods alone (Gedik, Kiraz, & Özden, 2012).
References:
Allen, E.
I., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007).
Blending In: The extent and
promise of
blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium [Sloan-C]. Needham, MA.
Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Özden, M. Y. (2012). The optimum blend: Affordances and
challenges of blended learning for
students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, July 2012, 3(3),
102-117.
So, H., & Bush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative
learning, social
presence and satisfaction in a
blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers
& Education, 51, 318-336.
Stacey, E. & Wiesenberg, F. (2007). A study of face-to-face and online teaching
philosophies in Canada and
Australia. Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 19-40.
Monday, May 6, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Defining a Project and Preventing Scope Creep
Developing a Common Understanding
During 2012, I was tasked with a project to implement blended learning using Blackboard© in all of my district’s Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) classrooms. In my mind, this sounded like a simple matter of showing the teachers how to add content to an online course. The scope creep issues occurred in two separate categories as I began to analyze the project and develop the process for implementation.Scope Creep of Expectations
I had no
idea how to plan a project of this size.
A month was spent meeting with my direct report, the executive director
charged with completing this project.
The executive director had a vision, but did not have the means to
articulate all the phases and details in our initial meeting. Several meetings were needed to truly develop
the scope of the project, and in-between each of these meetings I had to
research and design documents to determine if my understanding matched the
vision. During each meeting we went over
the documented process determined during the previous session and then the executive
director would add or change the process.
This was a frustrating experience because I did not understand that this
phase is a natural part of the project planning process (Portny, Mantel,
Meredith, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008).
Although this was not technically scope creep in the traditional sense,
it nevertheless created the same effect upon the expectations and plans for the
project.
Scope Creep of Project
Due to a
lack of project management practice in my project, scope creep occurred in
several areas and was difficult to prevent because there was no written
documentation of the agreed upon project scope and project plan. All I had was a process outlining how
teachers would be trained to become blended teachers and the deadlines for
completion. Scope creep happened in the
following ways:
· The list of teachers changed
continually throughout the project. This
meant that I was constantly adding new people for which I was responsible to
train, but then others were dropped and I did not know they were no longer a
member of the training group.
· A principal in one of the schools
wanted their entire school moved into blended learning. This created an issue in that I was unable to
support the extra numbers as effectively as the group that my direct report was
held accountable for.
· The project began as one for
training but became one of technical support in the system as the additional
teachers overloaded our miniature Blackboard© support staff. There was not a clear method for handling
technical issues.
In dealing with the issues, I
learned some valuable strategies for damage control and prioritization. However, from the study of project management
I have learned better strategies to prevent these issues in future projects and
found a great rap that synthesizes the practical experience I have gained.
References:
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R.,
Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., &
Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project
management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Project Management Gems
-->
Active Collab®
is a site that I found a year ago for my department when we were exploring how to manage, document, and communicate the progress on the various projects within our diverse group. As Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, and Kramer state in their book on project management, “projects that are particularly complex, challenging, or uncertain are often first to minimize the importance of planning, monitoring, and controlling effort so the team can focus on the ‘real work’ of the project” (2008, p. 318). Active Collab® is a terrific tool for quickly planning out projects via milestones, tasks, and tickets. For an organization this is useful in that a project manager can assign tasks with due dates to certain members and those assignees can document progress, time spent on task, notes, and digital evidence of completion. Along with the online site was an iPhone App that we used for mobile updates to our projects. Although the product was stellar, the implementation was not planned thoroughly, leaving inconsistent management of the project documentation. We have since phased out this site in our work, but it was because of a need for the basics of project management rather than an issue with the program.ProjectMinds
is a resource found while researching this week for assistance with planning, budgeting, and resource allocation. Dr. Stolovich in a multimedia program entitled “Creating a Resource Allocation Plan” shared, that it is essential for the project manager to plan resources realistically and it can be difficult to know what different budget items are correct (Stolovich, n/d). The Project Minds site breaks down the various components of project management and provides resources to help the novice at just the right place to be useful. Additionally, I found even more information shared by those in the field on their resources page. Throughout my current work, I have been implementing each step of the project management process with my spring project assignments and I often do not have my project management book at hand. This site has provided “just in time” information accessible from a mobile device or my laptop.References:
Portny,
S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., &
Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project
management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














